In §II. Theory, two reduced-order models are proposed, which the authors have termed: the quasi-steady model (§II.A. Quasi-steady one-dimensional model) & the inertial/hybrid model (§II.B. Quasi-one-dimensional pointmass model), respectively. N.b., in both cases time dependence isn’t explicitly modeled, i.e., technically speaking both models are quasi-steady. Ergo, in hindsight, it would have been more apt to call the model proposed in §II.A.: the matching-condition model. With that in mind, the readership is encouraged to substitute “matching-condition model/modeling regime” instead of “quasi-steady model/modeling regime,” when reading this conference paper. Moreover, the following title would have been more suitable: “Entropy-patch chokednozzle interaction: matching-condition and inertial modeling-regimes mapped”.

@en

Indirect combustion noise due to the interaction of flow inhomogeneities with a choked combustion-chamber exit is an important cause of combustion instability in solid rocket motors. Moreover, it is believed to be an issue in electrical-power generation turbines and aero-engines. If these flow inhomogeneities are essentially characterized by the fluid having a locally appreciably-different thermodynamic state, the acoustic response engendered by its interaction with the combustion-chamber exit is commonly referred to as entropy noise. In this paper, dedicated numerical-simulation results of entropy-patch choked-nozzle interactions are presented. Two types of entropy patches were considered: rectangular slugs and circular spots. Moreover, analytical-model-based analysis, of said simulation results, is presented. Based on said analysis, the authors posit the existence of three modeling regimes: the quasi-steady-modeling regime, the blended-physical-effects regime, and the inertial-modeling regime. @en

The combustion properties of hydrogen make premixed hydrogen-air flames prone to flashback. Several combustor concepts have been proposed and studied in the past few years to tackle the problem of flame flashback in premixed high hydrogen fuel combustors. This study looks at one of the concepts which uses the Aerodynamically Trapped Vortex to stabilize the flame. Burner concepts based on trapped vortex flame stabilization have a higher resistance towards flame blowout than conventional swirl stabilized burners. This work looks at the flow and flame behavior in the proposed Aerodynamically Trapped Vortex Combustor for 100% premixed hydrogen operation. Numerical simulations for the analysis were performed with the commercial CFD simulation package AVL FIRE^TM. The flow field characterization was focused on the investigation of the influence of both the inlet velocity and inlet turbulence intensity on the mean velocity, wall velocity gradient and turbulence intensity in the combustor. To study the flame stabilization mechanism, reactive simulations were performed at two fuel equivalence ratios. The combustion regime of the flame, turbulent flame speed and temperature distribution in the combustor were quantified from the simulation results. Combustion is modelled using a detailed chemistry solver with the k - e turbulence model to resolve turbulence. No additional turbulence-chemistry interaction model is used in the current research. To reduce chemistry computational time, the multi-zone method is employed. To capture the effect of preferential diffusion, two approaches were used to quantify the diffusion coefficient of each species. The diffusion coefficients were calculated using both mixture averaged approach and the multi component diffusion approach. The proposed design for the Aerodynamically Trapped Vortex combustor was able to stabilize a 100% premixed hydrogen flame without flashback for the simulated conditions.

@en