In §II. Theory, two reduced-order models are proposed, which the authors have termed: the quasi-steady model (§II.A. Quasi-steady one-dimensional model) & the inertial/hybrid model (§II.B. Quasi-one-dimensional pointmass model), respectively. N.b., in both cases time dependence isn’t explicitly modeled, i.e., technically speaking both models are quasi-steady. Ergo, in hindsight, it would have been more apt to call the model proposed in §II.A.: the matching-condition model. With that in mind, the readership is encouraged to substitute “matching-condition model/modeling regime” instead of “quasi-steady model/modeling regime,” when reading this conference paper. Moreover, the following title would have been more suitable: “Entropy-patch chokednozzle interaction: matching-condition and inertial modeling-regimes mapped”.

@en

Indirect combustion noise due to the interaction of flow inhomogeneities with a choked combustion-chamber exit is an important cause of combustion instability in solid rocket motors. Moreover, it is believed to be an issue in electrical-power generation turbines and aero-engines. If these flow inhomogeneities are essentially characterized by the fluid having a locally appreciably-different thermodynamic state, the acoustic response engendered by its interaction with the combustion-chamber exit is commonly referred to as entropy noise. In this paper, dedicated numerical-simulation results of entropy-patch choked-nozzle interactions are presented. Two types of entropy patches were considered: rectangular slugs and circular spots. Moreover, analytical-model-based analysis, of said simulation results, is presented. Based on said analysis, the authors posit the existence of three modeling regimes: the quasi-steady-modeling regime, the blended-physical-effects regime, and the inertial-modeling regime. @en