Conical-cylindrical shells are common geometries in launch-vehicle structures as stage adapters and payload adapters, and they are susceptible to buckling due to their large radius-to-thickness ratios. Buckling design guidance is available but it is limited for conical and cylindrical shells. There is no available buckling design guidance for conical-cylindrical shells. This paper presents the validation of two finite element models used to successfully predict the buckling behavior of a composite conical-cylindrical shell with and without reinforcement tested in two separate campaigns. The laminate design for the first test campaign consisted of a quasi-isotropic layup. For the second test campaign, additional composite plies were applied to reinforce the transition region of the original laminate. The work presented demonstrates the ability to predict the buckling behavior of a composite conical-cylindrical shells with two different designs, which may aid in creating buckling design guidance for conical-cylindrical shells. Additionally, this paper shows that there is no appreciable benefit to adding reinforcement to the transition region if the intent is to increase the buckling load, due to the fact reinforcement brings increased buckling imperfection sensitivity to the shell.@en

Launch-vehicle shell structures, which can be comprised of both cylindrical and conical sections, are known to be susceptible to buckling due to their large radius-to-thickness ratios. The advancements in composite manufacturing and numerical methods have enabled designers to consider more nontraditional shapes, such as connecting the conical and cylindrical sections with a toroidal transition to create a single-piece conical-cylindrical shell. This single-piece construction eliminates the need for a heavy interface ring between sections and has the potential to save mass. To better understand the buckling behavior, a composite conical-cylindrical shell was designed, fabricated, and tested. Prior to test, a finite element model that included thickness variations and radial imperfections was created. The test article buckled elastically at 251.8 kN, approximately 8.8% higher than the predicted buckling load of 231.4 kN Continued research in conical-cylindrical structures has the potential to expand the design space for launch-vehicle structures and lead to improved designs and reduced weight.@en