The presence of newly emerging pollutants in the aquatic environment poses great challenges for drinking water treatment plants. Due to their low concentrations and unknown characteristics, emerging pollutants cannot be efficiently removed by conventional water treatment processes, making technically, economically, and environmentally friendly water purification technologies increasingly important. This article introduces a one-step reverse osmosis (OSRO) concept consisting of riverbank filtration (RBF) and reverse osmosis (RO) for drinking water treatment. The OSRO concept combines the relatively low-cost natural pretreatment of river water with an advanced engineered purification system. RBF provides a continuous natural source of water with stable water quality and a robust barrier for contaminants. With the pre-removal of particles, organic matter, organic micro-pollutants (OMPs), and microbes, RBF becomes an ideal source for a purification system based on RO membranes, in comparison with the direct intake of surface water. OSRO treatment removes almost 99.9% of the particles, pathogens, viruses, and OMPs, as well as the vast majority of nutrients, and thus meets the requirements for the chlorine-free delivery of drinking water with high biostability. The OSRO treatment is cost effective compared with the standard conventional series of purification steps involving sprinkling filters, softening, and activated carbon. Artificial bank filtration (ABF), which functions as an artificial recharge in combination with a sand filtration system, is proposed as an alternative for RBF in the OSRO concept to supply drinking water from locally available resources. It is also suggested that the OSRO concept be implemented with wind power as an alternative energy source in order to be more sustainable and renewable. An OSRO-based decentralized water system is proposed for water reclaiming and reuse. It is suggested that future water treatment focus on the combination of natural and engineered systems to provide drinking water through technically efficient, financially feasible, resource reusable, and environmentally relevant means.

The potential of membrane scaling control by a real-time optimization algorithm was investigated. The effect of antiscalant dosing was evaluated from the induction time measured in glass batch-reactors, and from the operational performance of a lab-scale reverse osmosis (RO) unit and two pilot-scale RO units. Step changes in the antiscalant dosing demonstrated that the accumulation of scaling is ‘paused’ during periods when the optimum dose is applied. This is paramount for the application of a dynamic dosing strategy that may briefly underdose, while searching for the optimum dose. It was found that antiscalant underdose and overdose were both detrimental to RO operation since underdose resulted in membrane scaling, while overdose led to membrane fouling due to calcium-antiscalant deposits. The dosing algorithm was used to minimize antiscalant consumption in two pilot RO units. The algorithm was able to lower the antiscalant doses to 0.2 mg/L and 0.6 mg/L, while the supplier's recommended antiscalant doses were 2.0 mg/L and 4.5 mg/L, respectively. As a result, the algorithm could reduce antiscalant consumption by up to 85–90% for the plants mentioned.

Slow sand filters (SSFs) are widely applied to treat potable water; the removal of contaminants (e.g., particles, organic matter, and microorganism) occurs primarily in the top layer. However, the development of the microbial community and its metabolic function is still poorly understood. In the present study, we analyzed the microbial quantity and community of the influents sampled from the effluent of the last step (rapid sand filtration) and of the top layers of SSFs (Schmutzdecke, 0–2 cm, 4–6 cm, 8–10 cm) sampled near terminal head loss when the Schmutzdecke (SCM) was most developed in two full-scale drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs). The two DWTPs use the same artificially recharged groundwater source. The biomass in the filter, quantified by flow cytometric intact cell counts (ICC) and adenosine triphosphate (ATP), decreased rapidly along the depth till 8–10 cm (>1 log TCC; >75% ATP); the decrease was most pronounced from the SCM to the surface sand layer (0–2 cm), after which the biomass stabilized quickly at lower depths (2–10 cm). Remarkably, beta diversity showed that SSFs layers of the same depth in two DWTPs with distinctive filter age and plant location clustered together, which indicated their insignificant effects in shaping microbial communities in SSFs. The alpha diversity indices followed the trend of the biomass, suggesting more active and diverse communities in SCM layer. PICRUSt-based function prediction revealed significant over-representation of metabolism and degradation of complex organic matters (e.g., butanoate, propanoate, xenobiotic, D-Alanine, chloroalkene, and bisphenol) in SCM layer, the functional importance of which was confirmed by the co-occurrence patterns of the dominant taxa and metabolic functions. Using an island biogeography model, we found that microbial communities in SSFs were strongly assembled by selection (68 OTUs, 50.0% sequences), rather than by simple accumulation of the microbial communities in the influents (120 OTUs, 44.8% sequences). Our findings enhance the understanding of microbial community assembly and of metabolic function in the top layers of SSFs, and constitute a valuable contribution to optimizing the design and operation of biofilters in full-scale DWTPs.

The bacterial growth potential (BGP) of drinking water is widely assessed either by flow cytometric intact cell count (BGP_ICC) or adenosine triphosphate (BGP_ATP) based methods. Combining BGP_ICC and BGP_ATP measurements has been previously applied for various types of drinking water having high to low growth potential. However, this has not been applied for water with ultra-low nutrient content, such as remineralised RO permeate. To conduct a sound comparison, conventionally treated drinking water was included in this study, which was also used as an inoculum source. BGP_ICC, BGP_ATP, intact cell-yield (Y_ICC), and ATP-yield (Y_ATP) were determined for conventionally treated drinking water (Tap-water) and remineralised RO permeate (RO-water). In addition, both BGP_ICC and BGP_ATP methods were used to identify the growth-limiting nutrient in each water type. The results showed that the BGP_ICC ratio between Tap-water/RO-water was ∼7.5, whereas the BGP_ATP ratio was only ∼4.5. Moreover, the Y_ICC ratio between Tap-water/RO-water was ∼2 (9.8 ± 0.6 × 10⁶ vs. 4.6 ± 0.8 × 10⁶ cells/µg-C), whereas the Y_ATP ratio was ∼1 (0.39 ± 0.12 vs. 0.42 ± 0.06 ng ATP/µg-C), resulting in a consistently higher ATP per cell in RO-water than that of Tap-water. Both BGP_ICC and BGP_ATP methods revealed that carbon was the growth-limiting nutrient in the two types of water. However, with the addition of extra carbon, phosphate limitation was detected only with the BGP_ICC method, whereas BGP_ATP was not affected, suggesting that a combination of carbon and phosphate is essential for biomass synthesis, whereas carbon is probably utilised for cellular activities other than cell synthesis when phosphate is limited. It was estimated that the intact cell-yield growing on phosphate would be 0.70 ± 0.05 × 10⁹ cells/µg PO₄-P.

The role of phosphate and humic substances (HS) in preventing calcium carbonate scaling and their impact on antiscalant dose was investigated for a reverse osmosis (RO) system treating anaerobic groundwater (GW) (containing 2.1 mg/L orthophosphate and 6-8 mg/L HS). Experiments were conducted with the RO unit (treating anaerobic GW), and with a once-through lab-scale RO system (operating with artificial feedwater). Additionally, (batch) induction time (IT) measurements were performed with, i) real RO concentrate, and ii) artificial RO concentrates in the presence and absence of phosphate and HS. It was found that at 80% recovery (Langelier saturation index (LSI) 1.7), calcium carbonate scaling did not occur in the RO unit when the antiscalant dose was lowered from 2.2 mg/L (supplier's recommended dose) to 0 mg/L. The IT of the real RO concentrate, without antiscalant, was longer than 168 h, while, at the same supersaturation level, the IT of the artificial concentrate was approximately 1 h. The IT of the artificial concentrate increased to 168 h with the addition of 10 mg/L of phosphate, humic acid (HA), and fulvic acid (FA). Furthermore, in the lab-scale RO tests, the normalized permeability (Kw) of the membrane decreased by 20% in 2 h period when fed with artificial concentrate of 80% recovery containing no phosphate, whereas, with phosphate, no decrease in Kw was observed in 10 h period. These results indicate that phosphate and HS present in the GW prevented calcium carbonate scaling in the RO unit and reduced the use of commercial (synthetic) antiscalants.

Antiscalants are well known to prevent the precipitation of carbonate and sulphate scales of calcium in reverse osmosis (RO) applications, but according to literature their inhibitory ability against calcium phosphate is not clear. The objective of this study was to investigate if antiscalants, without acid addition, can prevent calcium phosphate scaling in RO systems. Eight calcium phosphate antiscalants from different manufacturers spanning a range of concentrations were tested in batch (in glass reactors) experiments to inhibit the formation of calcium phosphate in synthetic concentrate corresponding to 85% recovery (Ca²⁺ = 765 mg/L, PO₄³⁻ = 13–15 mg/L and pH = 7.6) of a groundwater RO in the Netherlands. Additionally, once-through lab-scale RO tests were conducted where an RO element was fed with synthetic concentrate and the performance of antiscalants was evaluated from the rate of flux-decline in the RO element. Without antiscalant addition, a substantial flux-decline was observed due to the deposition of amorphous calcium phosphate (ACP) on the RO membrane. The tested antiscalants were unable to inhibit the formation of ACP and were incapable of preventing the deposition of the formed ACP particles, since with each antiscalant, the flux of the RO element decreased at least 15% in a 3-h period. Briefly, the available antiscalants, tested in this study, did not provide acceptable inhibition of calcium phosphate scaling in RO applications.

Measuring bacterial growth potential (BGP) involves sample pre-treatment and inoculation, both of which may introduce contaminants in ultra-low nutrient water (e.g., remineralized RO permeate). Pasteurization pre-treatment may lead to denaturing of nutrients, and membrane filtration may leach/remove nutrients into/from water samples. Inoculating remineralized RO permeate samples with natural bacteria from conventional drinking water leads to undesired nutrient addition, which could be avoided by using the remineralized RO permeate itself as inoculum. Therefore, this study examined the effect of pasteurization and membrane filtration on the BGP of remineralized RO permeate. In addition, the possibility of using bacteria from remineralized RO permeate as inoculum was investigated by evaluating their ability to utilize organic carbon that is readily available (acetate, glucose) or complex (laminarin, gelatin, and natural dissolved organic carbon), as compared with bacteria from conventional drinking water. The results showed that membrane filtration pre-treatment increased (140–320%) the BGP of remineralized RO permeate despite the extensive soaking and flushing of filters (>350 h), whereas no effect was observed on the BGP of conventional drinking water owing to its high nutrient content. Pasteurization pre-treatment had insignificant effects on the BGP of both water types. Remineralized RO permeate bacteria showed limitations in utilizing complex organic carbon compared with bacteria from conventional drinking water. In conclusion, the BGP bioassay for ultra-low nutrient water (e.g., remineralized RO permeate) should consider pasteurization pre-treatment. However, an inoculum comprising bacteria from remineralized RO permeate is not recommended as the bacterial consortium was shown to be limited in terms of the compounds they could utilize for growth.

Although water produced by reverse osmosis (RO) filtration has low bacterial growth potential (BGP), post-treatment of RO permeate, which is necessary prior to distribution and human consumption, needs to be examined because of the potential re-introduction of nutrients/contaminants. In this study, drinking water produced from anaerobic groundwater by RO and post-treatment (ion exchange, calcite contactors, and aeration) was compared with that produced by conventional treatment comprising (dry) sand filtration, pellet softening, rapid sand filtration, activated carbon filtration, and UV disinfection. The multi-parametric assessment of biological stability included bacterial quantification, nutrient concentration and composition as well as bacterial community composition and diversity. Results showed that RO permeate remineralised in the laboratory has an extremely low BGP (50 ± 12 × 10³ ICC/mL), which increased to 130 ± 10 × 10³ ICC/mL after site post-treatment. Despite the negative impact of post-treatment, the BGP of the finished RO-treated water was >75% lower than that of conventionally treated water. Organic carbon limited bacterial growth in both RO-treated and conventionally treated waters. The increased BGP in RO-treated water was caused by the re-introduction of nutrients during post-treatment. Similarly, OTUs introduced during post-treatment, assigned to the phyla of Proteobacteria and Bacteroidetes (75–85%), were not present in the source groundwater. Conversely, conventionally treated water shared some OTUs with the source groundwater. It is clear that RO-based treatment achieved an extremely low BGP, which can be further improved by optimising post-treatment, such as using high purity calcite. The multi-parametric approach adopted in this study can offer insights into growth characteristics including limiting nutrients (why) and dominating genera growing (who), which is essential to manage microbiological water quality in water treatment and distribution systems.