The second-generation of supersonic civil transport has to match ambitious targets in terms of noise reduction and efficiency to become economically and environmentally viable. High-fidelity numerical optimization offers a powerful approach to address the complex trade-offs intri
...
The second-generation of supersonic civil transport has to match ambitious targets in terms of noise reduction and efficiency to become economically and environmentally viable. High-fidelity numerical optimization offers a powerful approach to address the complex trade-offs intrinsic to this novel configuration. Past and current research however, despite proving the potential of such design strategy, lacks in deeper insight on final layouts and optimization workflow challenges. Stemming from the necessity to quantify and exploit the potential of modern design tools applied to supersonic aircraft design, this work partially fills the gap in previous research by investigating RANS-based aerodynamic
optimization for both supersonic, transonic and subsonic conditions. The investigation is carried out with the state-of-the-art, gradient-based MDO framework \textit{MACH}, developed at University of Michigan's MDO Lab - which hosted the author for the 14-month research stint. Details of the tool and a brief overview of supersonic aircraft design and modern aerodynamic optimization strategies are reported in the first part of this manuscript.
After circumscribing the research niche, I perform single and multi-point optimization to minimize the drag over an ideal supersonic aircraft flight envelope and assess the influence of physical and numerical parameters on optimization accuracy and reliability. Leading and trailing edge morphing capabilities are introduced to improve the efficiency at transonic and subsonic flight speed by relaxing the trade-offs on clean shape optimization. Benefits in terms of drag reduction are quantified and benchmarked with fixed-edges results. It is observed how the optimized airfoils outperform baseline reference shapes from a minimum of 4\% up to 86\% for different design cases and flight
conditions. The study is then extended to the optimization of a planar, low-aspect-ratio, and low-sweep wing, using the same schematic approach of 2D analysis. I investigate the influence of wing twist alone and twist and shape on cruise performance, obtaining a drag reduction of 6\% and 25\% respectively as the optimizer copes with both viscosity and compressibility effects over the wing. Results for 3D multi-point optimization suggest that the proposed strategy enables a fast and effective design of highly-efficient wings, with drag reduction ranging from a minimum of 24\% up to 74\% for cruise at different speeds and altitudes, including edge deflection. Ultimately, this work provides an extensive and, to the best of author knowledge, unprecedented insight on the optimal design solutions for this specific aircraft configuration and the challenges of the optimization framework. The benefits of RANS-based aerodynamic shape optimization to capture non-intuitive design trade-offs and offer deeper physical insight are ultimately discussed and quantified. Given the promising results in terms of performance improvements and design efficiency, it is hoped that this work will foster the implementation of this method for more comprehensive full-configuration, multidisciplinary supersonic aircraft optimization studies.