Deliberately mutilated weapons and other objects are repeatedly discovered in ancient burials from the Iron Age. This research is focused on the Early Iron Age bent swords from the Hallstatt C period (800-600 BC) found in archaeological sites in the Netherlands. Metallographic re
...
Deliberately mutilated weapons and other objects are repeatedly discovered in ancient burials from the Iron Age. This research is focused on the Early Iron Age bent swords from the Hallstatt C period (800-600 BC) found in archaeological sites in the Netherlands. Metallographic research methods are used to investigate how these swords were bent, i.e., using a blacksmith’s fire or brute force. This elaborates on the Early Iron Age culture as it infers what kind of knowledge and skills were required for the bending process. With the help of a blacksmith, we created a replica to analyse the effect of different types of bending on the microstructure. This is compared with museum samples. Using optical microscopy and SEM(-EBSD) the microstructure of the museum sample and the replica are analysed for signs of deformation. Elemental analysis (SEM-EDS) is used on slag inclusion to estimate the initial iron and sword production processes. EPMA analysis was used to determine the carbon concentration throughout the samples, suggesting the use of wrought iron and hardening techniques. Results show that the Heythuysen sword contains multiple microstructure phases with various carbon concentrations. Most probably a combination of piling techniques and carburisation was applied during the production of the Heythuysen sword. The several bending methods of the replica show a distinction in the microstructure on the level of local misorientation. This is sensitive to the presence of inclusions and the changes in phase and grain size, which complicated the evaluation of the Heythuysen sword. The Heythuysen sword does not show strong evidence of bending by brute force and is most likely bent by a blacksmith with a fire.