The removal of iron from groundwater is essential to avoid aesthetic issues of the produced drinking water and to reduce maintenance cost of the system. The most applied iron removal method of oxidation and filtration produces large volumes of aqueous iron sludge of little value and the method is more likely to fail at high iron concentrations. This research investigates the novel concept of removing iron(II) anaerobically from groundwater by precipitation as vivianite (Fe3(PO4)2 ¢ 8 H2O) by dosing phosphate to the water. Natural groundwater was used to investigate the proposed method. A better understanding of the ironphosphate chemistry was obtained in experiments with a synthetic iron solution. To find a possible alternative to the limited resource phosphate, the possibility of removing iron by forming a compact mineral was also tested by dosing sulphate and carbonate. The chemical equilibriums and carried out experiments were evaluated by a geochemical model and the reaction products were analysed by X-ray diffraction. Up to 93% of iron removal by vivianite precipitation was obtained by dosing phosphate to anaerobic groundwater spiked with 100 mg Fe/L. An additional aeration step increased the efficiency to 99.9%, a higher total removal efficiency compared to the conventional aeration-filtration technique. The geochemical model showed that the anaerobic removal stopped when the saturation index (SI) of vivianite drops below 4, which explains why the last 7% were not removed anaerobically. Increasing the pH increases the SI of vivianite and can enhance further removal. Theoretically iron can be removed by vivianite precipitation starting from a concentration of 1 mg/L at a pH of 8.5. A second order kinetics was found for the removal of iron by vivianite precipitation at pH 7 with a rate constant of 2.27 M/s. The corresponding half life of iron is 4 minutes, while the half life of iron oxidation is 16 minutes at the same pH. Vivianite was the only crystalline end product detected and this decreased the sludge volume by a third compared to the sludge currently produced with oxidation and filtration. The total iron removal by sulphate addition only reached 73%, probably caused by the formation of iron(III)- sulphate complexes, and is therefore not a proper alternative to phosphate. The addition of carbonate reached an anaerobic removal of 59% and was increased to 99.9% by aeration. The formed sludge contained of a mixture of several oxidised compounds and the volume was almost 6 times higher compared to the currently produced aqueous iron sludge, which is why carbonate is not considered as an interesting alternative. The possibility of removing iron(II) anaerobically from groundwater by forming a compact mineral is successfully demonstrated. This method can increase the efficiency of drinking water production: higher throughput rates can be reached and a valuable end product with interesting reuse opportunities is created, provided that the phosphate can effectively be recovered from the water. It can decrease the operational costs of groundwater production substantially. The proposed novel method is a promising alternative to the conventional treatment method of oxidation and filtration, especially at plants where large iron sludge volumes are currently produced caused by elevated iron concentrations.