In the context of the ever-evolving 5G landscape, where network management and control are paramount, a new Radio Access Network (RAN) as emerged. This innovative RAN offers a revolutionary approach by enabling the flexible distribution of baseband functions across various nodes, all tailored to meet the ever-shifting demands of both system requirements and user traffic patterns. As users move within the network, the need to anticipate and strategically position these baseband functions becomes crucial for seamless network operation. Traditionally, this challenge has been tackled through a two-step process: first, forecasting traffic patterns, and then optimizing resource allocation accordingly. However, this approach falls short in guaranteeing an efficient placement when actual traffic demands surge onto the network. It often leads to resource overbooking, constraint violations, and excessive power consumption, putting strain on the network’s capabilities. In this paper, we introduce a novel framework based on a black-box optimization approach. This tool empowers prediction algorithms not just with historical traffic data but also with insights from optimization outcomes. The goal is to minimize a loss function related to power consumption and constraint violation: this ensures a predicted placement that is feasible and whose power is close to optimal. This approach ensures that the predicted placement is both feasible and power-efficient, bridging the gap between theoretical prediction and practical implementation. Remarkably, our proposed method, while potentially sacrificing some degree of traffic prediction accuracy, outperforms the conventional two-step approach by delivering a more efficient baseband function placement.@en

This paper reports on the first international competition on AI for the traveling salesman problem (TSP) at the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence 2021 (IJCAI-21). The TSP is one of the classical combinatorial optimization problems, with many variants inspired by real-world applications. This first competition asked the participants to develop algorithms to solve an orienteering problem with stochastic weights and time windows (OPSWTW). It focused on two learning approaches: surrogate-based optimization and deep reinforcement learning. In this paper, we describe the problem, the competition setup, and the winning methods, and give an overview of the results. The winning methods described in this work have advanced the state-of-the-art in using AI for stochastic routing problems. Overall, by organizing this competition we have introduced routing problems as an interesting problem setting for AI researchers. The simulator of the problem has been made open-source and can be used by other researchers as a benchmark for new learning-based methods. The instances and code for the competition are available at https://github.com/paulorocosta/ai-for-tsp-competition.

@en

Surrogate algorithms such as Bayesian optimisation are especially designed for black-box optimisation problems with expensive objectives, such as hyperparameter tuning or simulation-based optimisation. In the literature, these algorithms are usually evaluated with synthetic benchmarks which are well established but have no expensive objective, and only on one or two real-life applications which vary wildly between papers. There is a clear lack of standardisation when it comes to benchmarking surrogate algorithms on real-life, expensive, black-box objective functions. This makes it very difficult to draw conclusions on the effect of algorithmic contributions and to give substantial advice on which method to use when. A new benchmark library, EXPObench, provides first steps towards such a standardisation. The library is used to provide an extensive comparison of six different surrogate algorithms on four expensive optimisation problems from different real-life applications. This has led to new insights regarding the relative importance of exploration, the evaluation time of the objective, and the used model. We also provide rules of thumb for which surrogate algorithm to use in which situation. A further contribution is that we make the algorithms and benchmark problem instances publicly available, contributing to more uniform analysis of surrogate algorithms. Most importantly, we include the results of the six algorithms on all evaluated problem instances. This unique new dataset lowers the bar for researching new methods as the number of expensive evaluations required for comparison and for the creation of new surrogate models is significantly reduced.

@en