Investigating the interaction between influent particles and biomass is basic and important for the biological wastewater treatment. The micro-level methods allow for this, such as the microscope image analysis method with the conventional ImageJ processing software. However, these methods are cost and time-consuming, and require a large amount of work on manual parameter tuning. To deal with this problem, we proposed a deep learning (DL) method to automatically detect and quantify microparticles free from biomass and entrapped in biomass from microscope images. Firstly, we introduced a “TU Delft-Interaction between Particles and Biomass” dataset containing labeled microscope images. Then, we built DL models using this dataset with seven state-of-the-art model architectures for a instance segmentation task, such as Mask R-CNN, Cascade Mask R-CNN, Yolact and YOLOv8. The results show that the Cascade Mask R-CNN with ResNet50 backbone achieves promising detection accuracy, with a mAP50_box and mAP50_mask of 90.6 % on the test set. Then, we benchmarked our results against the conventional ImageJ processing method. The results show that the DL method significantly outperforms the ImageJ processing method in terms of detection accuracy and processing cost. The DL method shows a 13.8 % improvement in micro-average precision, and a 21.7 % improvement in micro-average recall, compared to the ImageJ method. Moreover, the DL method can process 70 images within 1 min, while the ImageJ method costs at least 6 h. The promising performance of our method allows it to offer a potential alternative to examine the interaction between microparticles and biomass in biological wastewater treatment process in an affordable manner. This approach offers more useful insights into the treatment process, enabling further reveal the microparticles transfer in biological treatment systems.

@en

Against the backdrop of severe leakage issue in water distribution systems (WDSs), numerous researchers have focused on the development of deep learning-based acoustic leak detection technologies. However, these studies often prioritize model development while neglecting the importance of data. This research explores the impact of data augmentation techniques on enhancing deep learning-based acoustic leak detection methods. Five random transformation-based methods—jittering, scaling, warping, iterated amplitude adjusted Fourier transform (IAAFT), and masking—are proposed. Jittering, scaling, warping, and IAAFT directly process original signals, while masking operating on time-frequency spectrograms. Acoustic signals from a real-world WDS are augmented, and the efficacy is validated using convolutional neural network classifiers to identify the spectrograms of acoustic signals. Results indicate the importance of implementing data augmentation before data splitting to prevent data leakage and overly optimistic outcomes. Among the techniques, IAAFT stands out, significantly increasing data volume and diversity, improving recognition accuracy by over 7%. Masking enhances performance mainly by compelling the classifier to learn global features of the spectrograms. Sequential application of IAAFT and masking further strengthens leak detection performance. Furthermore, when applying a complex model to acoustic leakage detection through transfer learning, data augmentation can also enhance the effectiveness of transfer learning. These findings advance artificial intelligence-driven acoustic leak detection technology from a data-centric perspective towards more mature applications.@en

The authors regret the implementation order of data augmentation and data splitting was incorrectly stated. Data augmentation should be implemented after data splitting. While the correct implementation order and its impacts on leakage detection performance were accurately discussed in Section 3.2 “Biased results caused by data leakage”, there were errors in the highlights, abstract, and conclusions sections. The corrections are as follows: 1. The second highlight should be corrected to “Data augmentation after splitting prevents biased results due to data leakage.”2. In the abstract, the corresponding sentence should be corrected to “Results indicate the importance of implementing data augmentation after data splitting to prevent data leakage and overly optimistic outcomes.”3. In the second paragraph of the conclusions, the first sentence should be corrected to “It is recommended to implement data augmentation after data splitting to avoid data leakage, which could lead to biased and overly optimistic results.”The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.

@en

Researchers and practitioners have extensively utilized supervised Deep Learning methods to quantify floating litter in rivers and canals. These methods require the availability of large amount of labeled data for training. The labeling work is expensive and laborious, resulting in small open datasets available in the field compared to the comprehensive datasets for computer vision, e.g., ImageNet. Fine-tuning models pre-trained on these larger datasets helps improve litter detection performances and reduces data requirements. Yet, the effectiveness of using features learned from generic datasets is limited in large-scale monitoring, where automated detection must adapt across different locations, environmental conditions, and sensor settings. To address this issue, we propose a two-stage semi-supervised learning method to detect floating litter based on the Swapping Assignments between multiple Views of the same image (SwAV). SwAV is a self-supervised learning approach that learns the underlying feature representation from unlabeled data. In the first stage, we used SwAV to pre-train a ResNet50 backbone architecture on about 100k unlabeled images. In the second stage, we added new layers to the pre-trained ResNet50 to create a Faster R-CNN architecture, and fine-tuned it with a limited number of labeled images (≈1.8k images with 2.6k annotated litter items). We developed and validated our semi-supervised floating litter detection methodology for images collected in canals and waterways of Delft (the Netherlands) and Jakarta (Indonesia). We tested for out-of-domain generalization performances in a zero-shot fashion using additional data from Ho Chi Minh City (Vietnam), Amsterdam and Groningen (the Netherlands). We benchmarked our results against the same Faster R-CNN architecture trained via supervised learning alone by fine-tuning ImageNet pre-trained weights. The findings indicate that the semi-supervised learning method matches or surpasses the supervised learning benchmark when tested on new images from the same training locations. We measured better performances when little data (≈200 images with about 300 annotated litter items) is available for fine-tuning and with respect to reducing false positive predictions. More importantly, the proposed approach demonstrates clear superiority for generalization on the unseen locations, with improvements in average precision of up to 12.7%. We attribute this superior performance to the more effective high-level feature extraction from SwAV pre-training from relevant unlabeled images. Our findings highlight a promising direction to leverage semi-supervised learning for developing foundational models, which have revolutionized artificial intelligence applications in most fields. By scaling our proposed approach with more data and compute, we can make significant strides in monitoring to address the global challenge of litter pollution in water bodies.

@en

Physically-based hydrological-geotechnical modeling at large scales is difficult, especially due to the time-consuming nature of flow routing and 3D soil stability models. Although parallelization techniques are commonly used for each model individually, there is currently no concurrent parallelization strategy for both. This study proposed an open-source, Parallelized, and modular modeling software for regional Hydrologic processes and Landslides simulation and prediction (PHyL v1.0). It offers parallel computation in both hydrological and 3D slope stability modules, cross-scale modeling ability via a soil moisture downscaling method, and advanced input/output (I/O) and post-processing visualization. Additionally, PHyL v1.0 is flexible and extensible, making it compatible with all mainstream operating systems. We applied PHyL v1.0 in the Yuehe River Basin, where the computational efficiencies, parallel performance, parameter sensitivity analysis, and predictive capabilities were evaluated. The PHyL v1.0 is therefore appropriately used as an advanced software for high-resolution and complex simulations of regional floods and landslides.

@en

Supervised Deep Learning (DL) methods have shown promise in monitoring the floating litter in rivers and urban canals but further advancements are hard to obtain due to the limited availability of relevant labeled data. To address this challenge, researchers often utilize techniques such as transfer learning (TL) and data augmentation (DA). However, there is no study currently reporting a rigorous evaluation of the effectiveness of these approaches for floating litter detection and their effects on the models' generalization capability. To overcome the problem of limited data availability, this work introduces the “TU Delft—Green Village” dataset, a novel labeled dataset of 9,473 camera and phone images of floating macroplastic litter and other litter items, captured using experiments in a drainage canal of TU Delft. We use the new dataset to conduct a thorough evaluation of the detection performance of five DL architectures for multi-class image classification. We focus the analysis on a systematic evaluation of the benefits of TL and DA on model performances. Moreover, we evaluate the generalization capability of these models for unseen litter items and new device settings, such as increasing the cameras' height and tilting them to 45°. The results obtained show that, for the specific problem of floating litter detection, fine-tuning all layers is more effective than the common approach of fine-tuning the classifier alone. Among the tested DA techniques, we find that simple image flipping boosts model accuracy the most, while other methods have little impact on the performance. The SqueezeNet and DenseNet121 architectures perform the best, achieving an overall accuracy of 89.6 and 91.7%, respectively. We also observe that both models retain good generalization capability which drops significantly only for the most complex scenario tested, but the overall accuracy raises significantly to around 75% when adding a limited amount of images to training data, combined with flipping augmentation. The detailed analyses conducted here and the released open source dataset offer valuable insights and serve as a precious resource for future research.@en

Plastic pollution in water bodies is an unresolved environmental issue that damages all aquatic environments, and causes economic and health problems. Accurate detection of macroplastic litter (plastic items >5 mm) in water is essential to estimate the quantities, compositions and sources, identify emerging trends, and design preventive measures or mitigation strategies. In recent years, researchers have demonstrated the potential of computer vision (CV) techniques based on deep learning (DL) for automated detection of macroplastic litter in water bodies. However, a systematic review to describe the state-of-the-art of the field is lacking. Here we provide such a review, and we highlight current knowledge gaps and suggest promising future research directions. The review compares 34 papers with respect to their application and modeling related criteria. The results show that the researchers have employed a variety of DL architectures implementing different CV techniques to detect macroplastic litter in various aquatic environments. However, key knowledge gaps must be addressed to overcome the lack of: (i) DL-based macroplastic litter detection models with sufficient generalization capability, (ii) DL-based quantification of macroplastic (mass) fluxes and hotspots and (iii) scalable macroplastic litter monitoring strategies based on robust DL-based quantification. We advocate for the exploration of data-centric artificial intelligence approaches and semi-supervised learning to develop models with improved generalization capabilities. These models can boost the development of new methods for the quantification of macroplastic (mass) fluxes and hotspots, and allow for structural monitoring strategies that leverage robust DL-based quantification. While the identified gaps concern all bodies of water, we recommend increased efforts with respect to riverine ecosystems, considering their major role in transport and storage of litter.

@en