This paper applies the Fully-Focussed SAR (FF-SAR) algorithm to CryoSat-2 full-bit-rate data to measure water levels of lakes and canals in the Netherlands, and validates these measurements by comparing them to heights measured by gauges. Over Lake IJssel, a medium-sized lake, the FF-SAR height is biased about 6 cm below the gauge height, and a similar bias is found at six sites where CryoSat-2 crosses rivers and canals. The precision of the FF-SAR measurements depends on the extent of multi-looking (incoherent averaging along-track) applied. Over Lake IJssel the precision varies from 4 to 11 cm, decreasing as multi-looking increases. The precision of FF-SAR with 100 m of multi-looking is equivalent to that of the standard delay/Doppler processing, which has an along-track resolution of about 300 m. The width and orientation of rivers and canals limits the maximum available multi-looking. After removing the 6 cm bias, FF-SAR heights of rivers and canals have an accuracy between 2 cm and several decimeters, primarily depending on the presence of other water bodies lying within the cross-track measurement footprint, as these contaminate the waveform. We demonstrate that FF-SAR processing is able to resolve and measure small ditches only a few meters in width. The visibility of these signals depends on the angle at which CryoSat-2 crosses the ditch and on whether or not the ditch remains straight within CryoSat-2’s field of view. In the best-case scenario, straight ditches at nearly 90° to the CryoSat-2 ground track, the ditch signal has high enough signal-to-noise to allow sub-decimeter accuracy of FF-SAR height measurement.

@en

We investigated the sensitivity of fully focused SAR (FF-SAR) processing of Cryosat-2 altimeter data to Earth rotation. Earth’s rotation causes scatterers at varying cross-track locations to have a different relative velocity with respect to the satellite. This second-order effect of Earth rotation on the phase is currently not corrected for in FF-SAR processing of altimetry data. The difference is largest near the poles, where the satellite flies parallel to the equator. Not correcting for the second-order effect yields a parabolic shape in the counter-rotated phase, which increases with the cross-track distance. Its effect is, however, limited by the time-in-view of the scatterer, which is shorter at the edge of the altimeter footprint, and therefore destructive interference will not occur when using Cryosat-2 data. For Cryosat-2, the only expected effect is a reduction in power and along-track resolution in the waveform tail and in the grating lobes. If the FF-SAR processor focuses on one point, and there is a bright scatterer at another, then there is a residual parabolic phase, whose sign and shape depend on the cross-track distance and whether the signal is left or right of the chosen focal point. In theory, if the viewed scene only has few bright coherent scatterers, then it might be possible to determine the cross-track position of each. In practice, however, natural targets are rarely coherent over the integration time.@en

We investigated the sensitivity of Fully-Focussed SAR (FF-SAR) processing of CryoSat-2 altimeter data to Earth rotation and exploit it to decontaminate waveforms in coastal zones. Earth's rotation causes scatterers at varying cross-track locations to have a different relative velocity with respect to the satellite. This second-order effect of Earth rotation on the phase is currently not corrected for in FF-SAR processing of altimetry data. The difference is largest near the poles, where the satellite flies parallel to the equator. We show when not correcting for this second-order effect it yields a parabolic shape in the counter rotated phase, which increases with the cross-track distance. If the FF-SAR processor focusses on one point, and there is a bright scatterer at another, then there is a residual parabolic phase, whose sign and shape depend on the cross-track distance and on whether the signal is left or right of the chosen focal point. In theory, if the viewed scene only has few bright coherent scatterers, then it might be possible to determine the cross-track position of each. In practice though, natural targets are rarely coherent over the integration time. The incoherent property of natural targets can, however, also be exploited to decontaminate waveforms in coastal tracks from land signals, by differencing two radargrams computed with two different focal points. If the cross-track distance between the focal points is set correctly, the speckle signal from the ocean becomes quasi-independent, while the land signal is similar in both radargrams and can subsequently be removed.@en