Cancer cell lines differ greatly in their sensitivity to anticancer drugs as a result of different oncogenic drivers and drug resistance mechanisms operating in each cell line. Althoughmany of these mechanisms have been discovered, it remains a challenge to understand how they interact to render an individual cell line sensitive or resistant to a particular drug. To better understand this variability, we profiled a panel of 30 breast cancer cell lines in the absence of drugs for their mutations, copy number aberrations, mRNA, protein expression and protein phosphorylation, and for response to seven different kinase inhibitors. We then constructed a knowledge-based, Bayesian computational model that integrates these data types and estimates the relative contribution of various drug sensitivity mechanisms. The resulting model of regulatory signaling explained the majority of the variability observed in drug response. The model also identified cell lines with an unexplained response, and for these we searched for novel explanatory factors. Among others, we found that 4E-BP1 protein expression, and not just the extent of phosphorylation, was a determinant of mTOR inhibitor sensitivity. We validated this finding experimentally and found that overexpression of 4E-BP1 in cell lines that normally possess low levels of this protein is sufficient to increase mTOR inhibitor sensitivity. Taken together, our work demonstrates that combining experimental characterization with integrative modeling can be used to systematically test and extend our understanding of the variability in anticancer drug response. Significance: By estimating how different oncogenic mutations and drug resistance mechanisms affect the response of cancer cells to kinase inhibitors, we can better understand and ultimately predict response to these anticancer drugs.@en

Background: Patients with BRCA1-like tumors correlate with improved response to DNA double-strand break-inducing therapy. A gene expression-based classifier was developed to distinguish between BRCA1-like and non-BRCA1-like tumors. We hypothesized that these tumors may also be more sensitive to PARP inhibitors than standard treatments. Methods: A diagnostic gene expression signature (BRCA1ness) was developed using a centroid model with 128 triple-negative breast cancer samples from the EU FP7 RATHER project. This BRCA1 ness signature was then tested in HER2-negative patients (n= 116) from the I-SPY 2 TRIAL who received an oral PARP inhibitor veliparib in combination with carboplatin (V-C), or standard chemotherapy alone. We assessed the association between BRCA1 ness and pathologic complete response in the V-C and control arms alone using Fisher ’s exact test, and the relative performance between arms (biomarker × treatment interaction, likelihood ratio p< 0.05) using a logistic model and adjusting for hormone receptor status (HR). Results: We developed a gene expression signature to identify BRCA1-like status. In the I-SPY 2 neoadjuvant setting the BRCA1ness signature associated signif icantly with response to V-C (p= 0.03), but not in the control arm (p = 0.45). We identified a significant interaction between BRCA1ness and V-C (p= 0.023) after correcting for HR. Conclusions: A genomic-based BRCA1-like signature was successfully translated to an expression-based signature (BRC1Aness). In the I-SPY 2 neoadjuvant setting, we determined that the BRCA1ness signature is capable of predicting benefit of V-C added to standard chemotherapy compared to standard chemotherapy alone. Trial registration: I-SPY 2 TRIAL beginning December 31, 2009: Neoadjuvant and Personalized Adaptive Novel Agents to Treat Breast Cancer (I-SPY 2), NCT01042379.@en

Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) is the second most frequently occurring histological breast cancer subtype after invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), accounting for around 10% of all breast cancers. The molecular processes that drive the development of ILC are still largely unknown. We have performed a comprehensive genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic analysis of a large ILC patient cohort and present here an integrated molecular portrait of ILC. Mutations in CDH1 and in the PI3K pathway are the most frequent molecular alterations in ILC. We identified two main subtypes of ILCs: (i) an immune related subtype with mRNA up-regulation of PD-L1, PD-1 and CTLA-4 and greater sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents in representative cell line models; (ii) a hormone related subtype, associated with Epithelial to Mesenchymal Transition (EMT), and gain of chromosomes 1q and 8q and loss of chromosome 11q. Using the somatic mutation rate and eIF4B protein level, we identified three groups with different clinical outcomes, including a group with extremely good prognosis. We provide a comprehensive overview of the molecular alterations driving ILC and have explored links with therapy response. This molecular characterization may help to tailor treatment of ILC through the application of specific targeted, chemo- and/or immune-therapies.@en