Predicting registration error can be useful for evaluation of registration procedures, which is important for the adoption of registration techniques in the clinic. In addition, quantitative error prediction can be helpful in improving the registration quality. The task of predicting registration error is demanding due to the lack of a ground truth in medical images. This paper proposes a new automatic method to predict the registration error in a quantitative manner, and is applied to chest CT scans. A random regression forest is utilized to predict the registration error locally. The forest is built with features related to the transformation model and features related to the dissimilarity after registration. The forest is trained and tested using manually annotated corresponding points between pairs of chest CT scans in two experiments: SPREAD (trained and tested on SPREAD) and inter-database (including three databases SPREAD, DIR-Lab-4DCT and DIR-Lab-COPDgene). The results show that the mean absolute errors of regression are 1.07 ± 1.86 and 1.76 ± 2.59 mm for the SPREAD and inter-database experiment, respectively. The overall accuracy of classification in three classes (correct, poor and wrong registration) is 90.7% and 75.4%, for SPREAD and inter-database respectively. The good performance of the proposed method enables important applications such as automatic quality control in large-scale image analysis.

@en

This paper reports a new automatic algorithm to estimate the misregistration in a quantitative manner. A random regression forest is constructed, predicting the local registration error. The forest is built using local and modality independent features related to the registration precision, the transformation model and intensity-based similarity after registration. The forest is trained and tested using manually annotated corresponding points between pairs of chest CT scans. The results show that the mean absolute error of regression is 0.72 ± 0.96 mm and the accuracy of classification in three classes (correct, poor and wrong registration) is 93.4 %, comparing favorably to a competing method. In conclusion, a method was proposed that for the first time shows the feasibility of automatic registration assessment by means of regression, and promising results were obtained.@en