The eutrophic Bouvigne pond (Breda, The Netherlands) regularly suffers from cyanobacterial blooms. To improve the water quality, the external nutrient loading and the nutrient release from the pond sediment have to be reduced. An enclosure experiment was performed in the pond between March 9 and July 29, 2020 to compare the efficiency of dredging, addition of the lanthanum-modified bentonite clay Phoslock® (LMB), the aluminum-modified zeolite Aqual-P™ (AMZ) and FeCl₂ to mitigate nutrient release from the sediment. The treatments improved water quality. Mean total phosphorus (TP) concentrations in water were 0.091, 0.058, 0.032, 0.031, and 0.030 mg P L^-1 in controls, dredged, FeCl₂, LMB and AMZ treated enclosures, respectively. Mean filterable P (FP) concentrations were 0.056, 0.010, 0.009, 0.005, and 0.005 mg P L^-1 in controls, dredged, FeCl₂, LMB and AMZ treatments, respectively. Total nitrogen (TN) and dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) were similar among treatments; lanthanum was elevated in LMB treatments, Fe and Cl in FeCl₂ treatments, and Al and Cl in AMZ treatments. After 112 days, sediment was collected from each enclosure, and subsequent sequential P extraction revealed that the mobile P pool in the sediments had reduced by 71.4%, 60.2%, 38%, and 5.2% in dredged, AMZ, LMB, and FeCl₂ treatments compared to the controls. A sediment core incubation laboratory experiment done simultaneously with the enclosure experiment revealed that FP fluxes were positive in controls and cores from the dredged area, while negative in LMB, AMZ and FeCl₂ treated cores. Dissolved inorganic nitrogen (DIN) release rate in LMB treated cores was 3.6 times higher than in controls. Overall, the applied in-lake treatments improved water quality in the enclosures. Based on this study, from effectiveness, application, stakeholders engagement, costs and environmental safety, LMB treatment would be the preferred option to reduce the internal nutrient loading of the Bouvigne pond, but additional arguments also have to be considered when preparing a restoration.

@en

It was recently discovered that vivianite (Fe₃(PO₄)₂.8H₂O) could be magnetically extracted from digested activated sludge which opened a new route for phosphorus recovery (Wijdeveld et al. 2022). While its formation in digested sludge is regularly reported, it is not yet studied for fresh, undigested activated sludge. In particular, the extent to which vivianite could form during sludge storage is missing. The current research showed that iron reduction was completed after 2–4 days of anaerobic storage, and the vivianite appeared to form quickly from the pool of reduced iron made available. After sludge thickening at the wastewater treatment plant (30 h retention time), around 11% of the iron was vivianite. With subsequent 1–3 days of anaerobic storage, this fraction increased to 50–55%. After this storage, almost all the vivianite that could potentially form did form. This research concluded that efficient vivianite formation can be achieved without a sludge digester, showing phosphorus recovery potential from undigested sludge via vivianite recovery. Besides, the recovery of vivianite from undigested sludge presents advantages like the reduction of the sludge to dispose of and mitigation of the vivianite scaling formation.

@en

In a wastewater treatment plant (WWTP), several sludge streams exist and the composition of their liquid phase varies with time and place. For evaluating the potential for formation of precipitates and equilibria for weak acids/bases, the ionic strength and chemical composition need to be known. This information is often not available in literature, and even neglected in chemical model-based research. Based on a literature review, we proposed three ranges of concentration (low, typical and high) for the major constituents of the liquid phase of the different streams in a WWTP. The study also discusses the reasons for the concentration evolution, and the exceptional cases, to allow readers to consider the right range depending on their situation. The ionic strength of the different streams and the contribution of its constituents were calculated based on the ionic composition. The major contributors to the ionic strength for the wastewater-based streams (influent, effluent and mixed sludge) were Na+, Cl-, Mg2+ and Ca2+, representing 50-70% of the ionic strength. For digestate, NH4+ and HCO3- accounted for 65-75% of the ionic strength. Even though the ionic strength is recognized to impact several important wastewater treatment processes, its utilization in literature is not always adequate, which is discussed in this study.

@en

Phosphorus (P) is an essential resource for food production and chemical industry. Phosphorus use has to become more sustainable and should include phosphorus recycling from secondary sources. About 20% of P ends up in sewage sludge, making this a substantial secondary P source. There is currently a technological gap to recover P from sludge locally at wastewater treatment plants (WWTP) that remove P by dosing iron. Vivianite (Fe₃(PO₄)₂•8(H₂O)) is the main iron phosphate mineral that forms during anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge, provided that enough iron is present. Vivianite is paramagnetic and can be recovered using a magnetic separator. In this study, we have scaled up vivianite separation from lab-scale to bench- and pilot-scale. Bench-scale tests showed good separation of vivianite from digested sewage sludge and that a pulsation force is crucial for obtaining a concentrate with a high P grade. A pilot-scale magnetic separator (capacity 1.0 m³/h) was used to recover vivianite from digested sewage sludge at a WWTP. Recirculating and reprocessing sludge allows over 80% vivianite recovery within three passes. A concentrated P-product was produced with a vivianite content of up to 800 mg/g and a P content of 98 mg/g. P recovery is limited by the amount of P bound in vivianite and can be increased by increased iron dosing. With sufficient iron dosing, the vivianite content can be increased, and subsequently more P can be recovered. This would allow compliance with existing German legislation, which requires a P recovery larger than 50%.

@en

The presence of soluble iron and phosphorus in wastewater sludge can lead to vivianite scaling. This problem is not often reported in literature, most likely due to the difficult identification and quantification of this mineral. It is usually present as a hard and blue deposit that can also be brown or black depending on its composition and location. From samples and information gathered in 14 wastewater treatment plants worldwide, it became clear that vivianite scaling is common and can cause operational issues. Vivianite scaling mainly occurred in 3 zones, for which formation hypotheses were discussed. Firstly, iron reduction seems to be the trigger for scaling in anaerobic zones like sludge pipes, mainly after sludge thickening. Secondly, pH increase was evaluated to be the major cause for the formation of a mixed scaling (a majority of oxidized vivianite with some iron hydroxides) around dewatering centrifuges of undigested sludge. Thirdly, the temperature dependence of vivianite solubility appears to be the driver for vivianite deposition in heat exchanger around mesophilic digesters (37 °C), while higher temperatures potentially aggravate the phenomenon, for instance in thermophilic digesters. Mitigation solutions like the use of buffer tanks or steam injections are discussed. Finally, best practices for safe mixing of sludges with each other are proposed, since poor admixing can contribute to scaling aggravation. The relevance of this study lays in the occurrence of ironphosphate scaling, while the use of iron coagulants will probably increase in the future to meet more stringent phosphorus discharge limits.

@en

Fertilizers are vital for our society since we use them to grow plants. These plants can produce fruits and vegetables that we can consume or use as feedstock for the animals, ending up in our plates. In short, we need fertilizers to make our food, and we are using an increasing quantity of it with the growing population. Phosphorus is an essential constituent of fertilizers and a critical element for every living organism since it is present in DNA and bones. The current approach is to mine phosphate rock to make fertilizer. This strategy is the only option we have so far to produce phosphorus in large quantities, but it is polluting, and the resources are not endless. In our society, we are trying to replace fossil energies with renewable energy. However, this cannot be done for phosphorus; nothing can substitute it. Therefore, we need to find alternatives to obtain phosphorus without further damaging the planet...@en