Optimal Approach and Departure Trajectories with Acoustic Footprint Assessment for an Air Mobility Quad-Rotor

Abstract

Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) vehicles are usually capable to operate in both forward and vertical flight thanks to their design configurations featuring multiple (tilting) rotors. Such maneuvering agility can be leveraged to minimize their acoustic footprint during operations close to the ground. The present work compares the acoustic footprint of optimal trajectories of AAM aircraft using low-order aero-acoustic models. The methodology is applied to the case of an AAM quad-rotor aircraft, which is modelled as a rotating point-mass with three Degrees of Freedom and two input controls. The trajectories are globally optimal in the sense of standard mission objectives, such as maneuver time or traveled horizontal distance, and are subject to realistic performance constraints. Results show that minimum-time trajectories generate higher and more concentrated noise footprints compared to minimum-distance trajectories, which distribute noise levels more evenly and result in overall lower noise footprints. Departure trajectories exhibit lower noise levels than approach trajectories. Adopting minimum-distance trajectories can significantly reduce noise impacts for both approach and departure maneuvers.