Responsible innovation in the hydraulic engineering sector

Book chapter (2020)

Authors

P.H.A.J.M. van Gelder Safety and Security Science - TPM
N. Doorn Ethics & Philosophy of Technology - TPM
J.G. de Gijt Hydraulic Structures and Flood Risk - CEG , Gemeente Rotterdam
Research Group
Economics of Technology and Innovation (TPM) (TU Delft)
More Info
expand_more

Published Date

2020

Language

English

Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Faculty

Technology, Policy and Management

Department

Values Technology and Innovation

Research Group

Economics of Technology and Innovation

Abstract

In this chapter we will discuss the practices and methods of responsible innovation in the hydraulic engineering sector, in which we investigate the values involved and how these values are dealt with. In particular, we will concentrate on the RAMSSHEEP concept – with RAMSSHEEP being an acronym for reliability, availability, maintainability, safety, security, health, environment, economics and politics. This is a concept from the hydraulic engineering sector, which was introduced as a risk-driven tool to optimise maintenance strategies. Although the RAMSSHEEP approach has shown its use for maintenance questions, the concept has so far not been applied to evaluate new innovations that are still in the design phase. The aim of this chapter is to explore whether the RAMSSHEEP framework can be used to structure conflicting values in the water sector. We do so on the basis of three short case studies. Dilemmas that emerge in these case studies, and the way these dilemmas are handled, are being addressed. We conclude that the RAMSSHEEP framework is a suitable (semi)quantitative tool to evaluate innovations in the hydraulic engineering domain, already in the design phase.