Barriers and facilitators to learn and improve through morbidity and mortality conferences

A qualitative study

Journal article (2017)

Authors

Marit S. de Vos Leiden University Medical Center
Jaap Hamming Leiden University Medical Center
P.J. Marang-van de Mheen Leiden University Medical Center
P. J. Marang-van De Mheen Leiden University Medical Center
Perla J. Marang-Van De Mheen Leiden University Medical Center
P.J. Marang-van De Mheen Leiden University Medical Center
Perla J. Marang-van De Mheen Leiden University Medical Center
Perla J. Marang-van de Mheen Leiden University Medical Center
P. J. Marang-van de Mheen Leiden University Medical Center
P.J. Marang-Van De Mheen Leiden University Medical Center
P. J. Marang-Van De Mheen Leiden University Medical Center
Affiliation
External organisation
More Info
expand_more

Published Date

2017

Language

English

Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Affiliation

External organisation

Abstract

Objectives To explore barriers and facilitators to successful morbidity and mortality conferences (M&M), driving learning and improvement. Design This is a qualitative study with semistructured interviews. Inductive, thematic content analysis was used to identify barriers and facilitators, which were structured across a pre-existing framework for change in healthcare. Setting Dutch academic surgical department with a long tradition of M&M. Participants An interview sample of surgeons, residents and physician assistants (n=12). Results A total of 57 barriers and facilitators to successful M&M, covering 18 themes, varying from case type' to leadership', were perceived by surgical staff. While some factors related to M&M organisation, others concerned individual or social aspects. Eight factors, of which four were at the social level, had simultaneous positive and negative effects (eg, hierarchy' and team spirit'). Mediating pathways for M&M success were found to relate to available information, staff motivation and realisation processes. Conclusions This study provides leads for improvement of M&M practice, as well as for further research on key elements of successful M&M. Various factors were perceived to affect M&M success, of which many were individual and social rather than organisational factors, affecting information and realisation processes but also staff motivation. Based on these findings, practical recommendations were formulated to guide efforts towards best practices for M&M.