Towards teleoperation with human-like dynamics

Human use of elastic tools

Conference paper (2017)

Authors

M. Aiple Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control - Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering

A. Schiele Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control - Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering

Research Group

Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control (Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering) (TU Delft)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/WHC.2017.7989896

Elasticity Teleoperation Actuators Human-robot interaction Telerobotics Actuators Tools Timing Springs Atmospheric measurements Particle measurements Manipulators Backward-forward swing motion Elastic element Elastic slave manipulators Elastic tools Hammering type tasks Human-like dynamic movements Human-like dynamics Teleoperator system control Variable stiffness actuators Teleoperators

To reference this document use:

http://resolver.tudelft.nl/uuid:c76d338d-1d43-4889-be56-49cb742f06bf

More Info

expand_more

Published Date

2017

Language

English

Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Faculty

Mechanical, Maritime and Materials Engineering

Department

Biomechanical Engineering

Research Group

Biomechatronics & Human-Machine Control

Abstract

Variable stiffness actuators undergo lower peak force in contacts compared to their rigid counterparts, and are thus safer for human-robot interaction. Furthermore, they can store energy in their elastic element and can release it later to achieve human-like dynamic movements. However, it is not clear how to integrate them in teleoperator systems so that they can be controlled intuitively by a human. We performed an experiment to study human use of elastic tools to determine how a teleoperator system with an elastic slave would need to be designed. For this, we had 13 untrained participants hammer with an elastic tool under different stiffness conditions, asking them to try to find the best timing for a backward-forward swing motion in order to achieve the strongest impact. We found that the participants generally executed the task efficiently after a few trials and they converged to very similar solutions. The stiffness influenced the performance slightly, a stiffness between 2.3 Nm/rad and 4.1 Nm/rad showing the best results. We conclude that humans intuitively know how to efficiently use elastic tools for hammering type tasks. This could facilitate the control of teleoperator systems with elastic slave manipulators for tasks requiring explosive movements like hammering.

Files

Whc2017_20170327.pdf

(pdf | 3.61 Mb)

Unknown license