The evolution of process-based hydrologic models

Historical challenges and the collective quest for physical realism

Journal article (2017)

Authors

Martyn P. Clark University Corporation for Atmospheric Research
Marc F.P. Bierkens Universiteit Utrecht
Luis Samaniego Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research - UFZ
Ross A. Woods University of Bristol
R. Uijlenhoet Wageningen University & Research
Katrina E. Bennett Los Alamos National Laboratory
Valentijn R.N. Pauwels Monash University
Xitian Cai Princeton University
Andrew W. Wood University Corporation for Atmospheric Research
Christa D. Peters-Lidard NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
Affiliation
External organisation
More Info
expand_more

Published Date

2017

Language

English

Reuse Rights

Other than for strictly personal use, it is not permitted to download, forward or distribute the text or part of it, without the consent of the author(s) and/or copyright holder(s), unless the work is under an open content license such as Creative Commons.

Affiliation

External organisation

Abstract

The diversity in hydrologic models has historically led to great controversy on the "correct" approach to process-based hydrologic modeling, with debates centered on the adequacy of process parameterizations, data limitations and uncertainty, and computational constraints on model analysis. In this paper, we revisit key modeling challenges on requirements to (1) define suitable model equations, (2) define adequate model parameters, and (3) cope with limitations in computing power. We outline the historical modeling challenges, provide examples of modeling advances that address these challenges, and define outstanding research needs. We illustrate how modeling advances have been made by groups using models of different type and complexity, and we argue for the need to more effectively use our diversity of modeling approaches in order to advance our collective quest for physically realistic hydrologic models.